Purchase of Land by a Government Entity
SB 584 (S. Hays)/HB 901 (R. Stone)

  • Summary:  County may purchase land for conservation purposes only if:
  • An accurate inventory of government-owned property, not more than 1 year old, is made public; 
  • Sufficient funds are approved in the county’s annual budget for the maintenance of existing properties; 
  • An analysis by the county describing the annual cost of maintenance of the proposed land purchase is completed; and
  • An equal amount of public property not being held in conservation is returned or sold at fair market value to the private sector.
    • Status:
    • The bills have yet to be heard in committee; four references in the Senate. House bill referred to four committees.  
    • Sponsors believe government owns too much land.  Sponsors reference the purchase of whole parcels when only portions needed for conservation, and the need to reduce management costs and increase tax rolls.       

Ocean Outfalls
SB 444 (S. Diaz de la Portilla)/ HB 707 (R. Diaz)

  • Summary: In 2008, the Legislature prohibited the construction of new ocean outfalls and required that all six existing ocean outfalls meet advanced wastewater treatment (AWT) standards by 2018, and cease discharging wastewater by 2025.  In addition, those wastewater facilities were required to install a reuse system capable of providing a minimum of 60% of the actual flow. The bill amends current law:
  • Ocean outfalls must have a fully operational reuse system comprising 100 percent of the “baseline flow” (from “average daily flow”) annually by December 31, 2018. 
  • Utilities that share an ocean outfall are individually responsible for meeting reuse requirements but may share or transfer responsibility. 
  • Backup discharge may include peak flows from other wastewater management systems, but may not cumulatively exceed 5% of baseline, measured as a 5-year rolling average, and subject to secondary waste treatment and WQBELs. 
  • If in compliance, discharges are deemed to meet AWT
  • Detailed plan for DEP to include technical, environmental, and economic feasibility of reuse options, costs of treatment and comparison with other sources, availability of traditional water supplies, the need for AWS and offset from potable water supplies. 
  • DEP, SFWMD, and utilities must consider the detailed plan to adjust the reuse requirements as necessary. DEP shall submit a report to the Legislature by February 15, 2015.


  • Senate bill referred to four committees; House bill referred to three committees.  Both bills passed unanimously in their first committees of reference this week.  

Agricultural Lands
HB 203 (R. Beshears)/SB 1190 (Sen. Brandes)

  • Summary:
  • Prohibits a “governmental entity” (currently, a “county”) from adopting or enforcing any prohibition, restriction, regulation, or other limitation on activity of bona fide farm operation on land classified as agricultural land.
  • Prohibits governmental entity from charging an assessment or fee on a bona fide farm “activity” that is regulated through BMPs or other state or federal regulations.
    • Status:  
    • Four committees of reference in House; passed H. Ag & NR unanimously; now in Local and Federal Affairs.
    • Four committees of reference in Senate; on Senate Ag agenda for 3/11/13.
    • Working with bill sponsor to address concerns over broad interpretation and fiscal impact to counties, most notably with regard to MSBU’s and other service-related assessments. Sponsor has agreed to an amendment that would delete the term “assessment” and limit the proscription to duplicative fees on “specific activities. Senate bill was filed last week with amendment language.

SB 1106 (S. Hays)/HB 927 R. Raschein)

  • Summary:
  • Provides legislative intent to “eliminate duplication of regulatory authority over “agritourism.”
  • Revises definition of “agritourism activity” currently in statute as follows: “any activity consistent with a bona fide farm or ranch or in a working forest that allows members of the general public, for recreational, entertainment, or educational purposes, to view or enjoy agricultural-related rural activities, including, but not limited to, farming, ranching, historical, cultural, or harvest-your-own, or nature-based activities and attractions.”
  • A local government may not adopt an ordinance, regulation, rule, or policy that prohibits, restricts, regulates, or otherwise limits an agritourism activity on land classified as agricultural land.  
  • Defines “inherent risks of agritourism activity” (including land conditions, animal behavior, structures and equipment), and provides that owners, professionals and employees are not liable for injuries if a “notice of risk” is posted. 


  • House bill filed on 2/20/13. Referred to Agriculture and Natural Resources Subcommittee; Civil Justice Subcommittee and State Affairs Committee.  Yet to be heard. 
  • Senate bill filed on 2/21/13.   Referred to Agriculture; Community Affairs and Rules.  The bill is on the agenda next week, 03/11/13.  
  • Met with both sponsors, and the staff director and Chairman of the Agriculture and Natural Resources Subcommittee.  All understand our concerns and are willing to amend the language to narrow the scope of the preempted activities. 

Government-Owned Utilities
HB 733 (R. Mayfield)

  • Summary:
  • Consent is not required of counties providing utility services where they are already being provided by others if those services are being provided pursuant to a franchise agreement that has expired.  Counties must first conduct a referendum, the results of which indicate a preference for County service.
  • Adds a county consent requirement for municipalities wishing to extend corporate powers into unincorporated areas.
  • Defines the term “public entity” to include a municipality supplying electricity or gas outside of incorporated boundaries.
  • Subjects any municipality that sells water or wastewater utility services outside of its incorporated boundaries to regulation by the Public Service Commission.
    • Status:  
    • Four committees of reference; Energy & Utilities; Local & Federal Affairs; Government Operations Appropriations; and Regulatory Affairs.   Bill has yet to be heard.   
    • This week, Senator Garcia filed a bill (SB 1620) with only the county consent requirement for municipalities wishing to extend corporate powers into unincorporated areas.  Referred to Communications, Energy, and Public Utilities; Community Affairs; Judiciary; and Rules

Environmental Permitting
HB 999 (R. Patronis)

  • Summary:  Among other things, the bill provides: 
  • Limits on requests for additional information (RAIs) on development applications
  • Exemptions from sovereign submerged lands regulations and  fees, and requires general permits for special events like boat shows.
  • A preemption on water supply well permitting.
  • A new definition to consider in OHWM delineations.
  • Additional exemptions for stormwater permitting for manmade ponds and certain wetlands.
  • Requirements for regulation of water quality standards and deviations.
  • The addition of DACS to those entities involved in regional water supply planning.
  • Revisions to the air source permitting fee structure.
    • Status:  
    • Referred to three committees: Agriculture & Natural Resources Subcommittee; Agriculture & Natural Resources Appropriations Subcommittee; and State Affairs Committee.      
    • The first of what may be several stakeholder meetings is scheduled for next week, March 12, at 9:30 a.m.